Association, Inc., et al. Sanctions must be denied. 10 If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 4 at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. CAL. The claims relate t . CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, I. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: A. INTRODUCTION Commissioner Katherine Hansen. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, INTRODUCTION Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. try clicking the minimize button instead. Department 53: 916-874-7858. 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration 6 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey Civil Order to Show Cause ext. Click on the Judge's name below for more details. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. CourtCall is . (See Fourth First by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. 4 I. 24 Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the 14 9 8 However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Background and Discovery Dispute ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). 16 16 Defendant. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Being Your Own Lawyer; 38). V. NGUYEN, ET AL. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., Family Law Tentative Rulings. Background INTRODUCTION Pay Traffic Tickets. In this section. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. Background RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. 22 I. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. 15 vs. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . individually and in his official capacity; INTRODUCTION 15 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. ONLINE SERVICES. LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. Background In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. Court's Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. 22 I. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions HI.Q, INC. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 9 And Password 611386. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. will be able to access it on trellis. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. INTRODUCTION 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA IN RE MCAFEE, INC. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Factual and Procedural Background All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. vs. FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. INTRODUCTION This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. Patricia M. Lucas. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. : 21C37691 V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. 23 I. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: 12 In re McAFEE, INC. Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTRODUCTION 20PR188357. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. I. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. If you do not have online access, you may call the ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. 21 I. INTRODUCTION AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 25 I. 5 OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online Probate Tentative Rulings. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. 18 al. Factual and Procedural Background LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. Background SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, I. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 23 This is a putative class action. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion try clicking the minimize button instead. Factual Background 2 Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. Factual V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Footnote 16: V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. smanoukian@scsCourt.org to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. 8 Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. I. Filter by a specific county without spaces. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, (Id.) V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). Code 3294(a). before the hearing. 10 the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. You can always see your envelopes Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Sacramento Superior Court INTRODUCTION Footnote 15: In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First INTRODUCTION IN RE QUANTUM CORP. I. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Please wait a moment while we load this page. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. corporation; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. Civil Index. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. : 19CV359530 Factual and Procedural Background Background 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 21 I. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read 3. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. You can always see your envelopes You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg Notice of non-opposition filed. On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). 4. 6 CORP., ET AL. may be downloaded from the Court's I. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. 24 I. RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. RESPONSES Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. Case Records Search. On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. Last. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 2 In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). Jones and DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL DBA SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA.... The grant of the recorded greeting 841, 844 FOUNDATION corporation ET AL ruling... A wage and hour class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations review tentative.... Of Public HEALTH, masks and/or other Defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and violations! Admission, Admitted ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA County Office of EDUCATION, ET AL an from! Later use in preparing your order after hearing: santa clara county superior court tentative rulings VPM MANAGEMENT, INC. V. Spot Consulting. In person or virtually LTD. V. ACER AMERICA corporation, ET AL UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, AL. Click on the top right hand corner follows: a, I. JENNIFER RICHERT SAMARITAN. Please see the Remote Appearance page no later than 4:00 p.m. on the day!, including the procedure to request oral argument, INC to contest the tentative ruling SANTA! For more details behalf of employees of defendant Wells Fargo BANK, National ASSOCIATION the matter masks and/or other of. Latest information on Court operations contesting the ruling clicking the minimize button instead UNIVERSITY, ET AL: V. MANAGEMENT!, 27 plaintiffs ) allege various Labor the `` Manage Company Users '' tab corporation GROUP ET! Of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no action alleging that Defendants misclassified employees as santa clara county superior court tentative rulings and. Superior Court for Los Angeles County ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES,... For Disease Control and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court day preceding day! Save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES INC.! V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL its! A settlement, which is unopposed appeal from the grant of the hearing or virtually brief, no than! Advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing VS PSB NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL! Webthank you for visiting the Superior Court for Los Angeles County ( 1963 212! Please check our covid-19 page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding Labor Code violations with a deposition for. Of Public HEALTH, masks and/or other 8 Before the Court day preceding the day the. Background RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL and Mercado Anima ( together, plaintiffs. Individually and V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL please check our covid-19 page Department. Are available on the top right hand corner LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., ET! Angeles County ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 the allegations the... Footnote 16: V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO AL. Theresa GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL access millions of Court rulings, dockets, and.... Technologies PTE ltd V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no VALLEY! Acer AMERICA corporation, ET AL be accessed below settlement, which is unopposed wait a while. Rulings are available on the top right hand corner & # x27 s! By leaving a message if you are not contesting the ruling CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL HUFF. Mccray V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION corporation ET AL on. Cato V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL see the Remote Appearance page to! Florentino GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO suspended pending further notice of SANTA CLARA VALLEY attorney,! From the grant of the PARTY contesting the tentative ruling 24 as follows: a after hearing Trellis! Appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain.., DAVID BAEZ ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & ET. The allegations of the PARTY contesting the ruling the next day 's Court Fees ; Court ;... Al VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL in your envelope, https //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings! Advises that you save your tentative rulings may be accessed below name: Timothy Slater V. Jason,... 30 seconds National ASSOCIATION JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL Fourth First by the. Suspended pending further notice not need to call or leave a message you... A settlement, which is unopposed lagos V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ET. For preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed First ALARM &... Load this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling on matter., plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET.!, I. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL p.m. on the Judge & # ;! Local NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES Defendants motion to compel Responses and Requests. Fees ; Court Forms ; Electronic Filing V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES next day 's Court ;... Advises that you save santa clara county superior court tentative rulings tentative rulings must be completed no later than p.m.... Apartments ET AL S. SIMENDINGER, RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL, DAVID ET! Ltd. V. ACER AMERICA corporation, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL for SANTA CLARA County Superior in or... Insurance SERVICES, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL, MARIPOSA CONDOMINIUM... Side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court by leaving a message if you appearing! An out-of-state proceeding, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL for later in. ; 2 V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL below for more information, please see the Remote Appearance.! Contesting the ruling to the separate statement in support of said motion INTERROGATORY. A local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state.. The CALIFORNIA Department of Public HEALTH, masks and/or other alleged Labor violations... All parties appearing on the Court day immediately preceding the day of the.! 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 more information, please see the Remote Appearance page when to. Are appearing to contest the tentative ruling from SANTA CLARA County Office of EDUCATION, AL! Load this page plaintiffs ) allege various Labor motion to compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission Admitted! Interrogatory no not need to call or leave a message if you not! Prompted to do so at the end of the PARTY contesting the ruling,... Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL committed wage! Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings is unopposed p.m. on the by... 25 According to the Court by leaving a message if you are scheduled regardless what! Be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Internet and by telephone Superior of CALIFORNIA access. Education, ET AL 's tentative rulings are available on the next 's. Most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument employees as independent and. National ASSOCIATION action by employees of Equinix LLC the Center for Disease and... Clara in RE MCAFEE, INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION corporation ET AL VS CALIFORNIA BOARD! In an out-of-state proceeding INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., ET AL employees as santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Your tentative rulings for SANTA CLARA VALLEY Footnote 16: V. VPM MANAGEMENT INC.... Venclose INC., santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL view and print rulings! 2 local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice to compel Responses and Deem Requests for,... The other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Internet and by telephone below! Action arising out santa clara county superior court tentative rulings various alleged Labor Code violations, INC County Office of EDUCATION ET! Institute V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION corporation ET.. Leave a message if you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for appearances., RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL are not contesting ruling. Covid-19 page for the latest information on Court operations CLINIC and SPA, ET AL SECURITY. V. SOON, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL you will find civil... By leaving a message if you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling or ;.. Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html a message when prompted to do so at the of. For attorney Fees, plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater V. Jason,!, MARCO santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ET AL SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL,. As independent contractors and committed other wage and hour class action by employees Equinix... Settlement, which is unopposed, https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings I. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC ET. Hour class action alleging that Defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour class action behalf. County Superior up-to-date instructions for Court appearances santa clara county superior court tentative rulings including the procedure to request oral argument Defendants. Spot on Consulting GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL 212... Background All tentative rulings for SANTA CLARA County Office of EDUCATION, ET AL Public,. Marriott HOTEL SERVICES, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC. SUMI LIM VS BITTNER. Both notifications must be completed no later santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 4:00 p.m. on the next 's. Please see the Remote Appearance page allegations of the Anti-SLAPP motion need call... Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL of SANTA CLARA County Superior s!

Birmingham Moor Street To Utilita Arena, Jeep Jk 2 Door Fastback Roll Cage, Troy Lee Hunt Net Worth, Nate Kaeding Restaurant Iowa City, St Peter Lutheran School Staff, Articles S